The Inquisition
“Upon the Golden Throne abides the eternal will of the Emperor.”
Contents
Contents
Overview
An Inquisitor pores over forbidden lore — the hidden knowledge that only an Inquisitor may safely wield
Inquisitors gather in conclave, their philosophies as varied as the threats they hunt
A Witch Hunter of the Ordo Hereticus and his trusted agent stand vigil over the faithful
The Witch Hunters pursue heretics and rogue psykers across the worlds of the Imperium
A Grey Knight — the Ordo Malleus's secret Chamber Militant, forged to slay daemons
The eternal war against the Neverborn: a Grey Knight banishes a daemon back to the Warp
An Alien Hunter of the Ordo Xenos bears the scars of a lifetime spent confronting the xenos threat
The Deathwatch — the Chamber Militant of the Ordo Xenos — holds the line against the alien
Puritan and Radical: The War Within
Beneath the Inquisition's united purpose of defending the Empire lies a schism as old as the organisation itself—a fundamental disagreement over how the Emperor's enemies may justly be opposed. This ideological divide separates the Inquisition into two broad philosophical camps, the Puritans and the Radicals, whose differences run so deep that Inquisitors of opposing convictions have hunted and slain one another with the same ruthlessness they reserve for heretics. It is the central tension of the Inquisition's existence: the question of how far a servant of the Emperor of Mankind may go in His defence before they become the very thing they were sworn to destroy.
The Puritan factions hold that the Imperium's enemies must be opposed through unwavering faith, doctrinal purity, and the absolute rejection of all forbidden things. To a Puritan, corruption is a contagion that spreads through proximity and compromise; the only safe response to the daemonic, the alien, and the heretical is utter and uncompromising destruction. Among the Puritans, the Amalathians counsel patience and the preservation of the existing Imperial order, believing that the Emperor's divine plan unfolds through stability rather than upheaval. The Monodominants take a far harsher view, holding that humanity alone has the right to exist and that every threat—internal or external—must be answered with overwhelming force, the purging flame, and the sanction of Exterminatus where necessary.
The Radical factions, by contrast, argue that the Imperium faces enemies so terrible that conventional means are insufficient to defeat them—and that only by turning the enemy's own weapons against him can humanity hope to survive. To a Radical, the refusal to use every available tool is a kind of cowardice that dooms the Imperium to slow defeat. The Xanthites believe that the power of Chaos can be harnessed and wielded against the daemonic, binding the Neverborn into weapons and armour. The Recongregators seek to deliberately destabilise the Imperium's fossilised institutions, believing that only through controlled crisis can humanity be reformed and strengthened. The Istvaanians hold that conflict itself is the crucible in which humanity is forged, and that the Imperium grows strong only through perpetual war and tribulation.
The danger of the Radical path is written in the fate of those who have walked it. Countless Inquisitors who believed themselves strong enough to wield daemonic power, to traffic with the alien, or to manipulate heresy for the greater good have instead been consumed by the very corruption they sought to master. A daemon bound into a blade whispers ceaselessly to the hand that wields it; forbidden knowledge, once learned, cannot be unlearned; and the line between using the enemy's power and becoming the enemy is so fine that few who cross it ever realise they have done so. For this reason, the Puritan majority regards Radicalism not as a legitimate philosophy but as heresy in slow motion—and the most feared duty of any Inquisitor is the hunting of one of their own who has fallen.
Yet the Inquisition tolerates this internal war because it serves a vital function. The absence of a single binding doctrine ensures that no orthodoxy can calcify into the kind of institutional blindness that has crippled so much of the Empire. The perpetual argument between Puritan caution and Radical pragmatism forces every Inquisitor to confront the moral weight of their actions, to justify their methods, and to remain forever vigilant against the seductions of their own power. When Inquisitors gather in conclave to judge a great threat, the clash of these philosophies produces decisions tempered by genuine debate rather than rote dogma. In the grim darkness of the far future, where certainty is the first step toward damnation, the Inquisition's willingness to wage war upon itself may be the strange and terrible source of its enduring strength.